School-based After-school Learning and Support Programmes 2015/16 s.y.
School-based Grant - Programme Report
Name of School: Pentecostal Lam Hong Kwong School
Project Coordinator: Mr.Ho Shu Chee Contact Telephone No.: 26428252
A. The number of students (count by heads) benefitted under this programme is 29 (including A. 6 CSSA recipients, B. 11 SFAS
full-grant recipients and C. 12 under school’s discretionary quota).
B. Information on Activities under the Programme
Actual no. of
participating
eligible
students
#
 
*Name / Type of activity
A
B
C
Average
attendance
rate
Period/Date
activity held
Actual expenses
($)
Method(s) of evaluation
(e.g. test, questionnaire, etc)
Name of partner/
service provider
(if applicable)
A1 Personal development
programs (S3-S4)
6
7
7
80%
9/2015-1/2016
4000
Evaluation meeting
Teen 行者
A2 Senior form
enhancement & remedial
programs
/
/
1
90%
9/2015-1/2016
500
Evaluation meeting
/
A3 Summer programs
(S2 & S4)
/
4
4
90%
7/2016-8/2016
4800
Evaluation meeting
Yes Power
Total no. of activities:
___3__
@No. of man-times
6
11
12
**Total no. of man-times
29
Total Expenses
9300
 
 
C.Project Effectiveness
In general, how would you rate the achievements of the activities conducted to the benefitted
eligible students?
 
Improved
Please put a “” against the most appropriate box.
Significant
Moderate
Slight
No
Change
Declining
Not
Applicable
Learning Effectiveness
a)
Students’ motivation for learning
b)
Students’ study skills
c)
Students’ academic achievement
d)
Students’ learning experience outside classroom
e)
Your overall view on students’ learning effectiveness
Personal and Social Development
f)
Students’ self-esteem
g)
Students’ self-management skills
h)
Students’ social skills
i)
Students’ interpersonal skills
j)
Students’ cooperativeness with others
k)
Students’ attitudes toward schooling
l)
Students’ outlook on life
m)
Your overall view on students’ personal and social
development
Community Involvement
n)
Students’ participation in extracurricular and voluntary
activities
o)
Students’ sense of belonging
p)
Students’ understanding on the community
q)
Your overall view on students’ community
involvement
 
D. Comments on the project conducted
Problems/difficulties encountered when implementing the project
(You may tick more than one box)
unable to identify the eligible students (i.e., students receiving CSSA, SFAS full grant);
difficult to select suitable non-eligible students to fill the discretionary quota;
eligible students unwilling to join the programmes;
the quality of service provided by partner/service provider not satisfactory;
tutors inexperienced and student management skills unsatisfactory;
the amount of administrative work leads to apparent increase on teachers’ workload;
complicated to fulfill the requirements for handling funds disbursed by EDB;
the reporting requirements too complicated and time-consuming;
Others (Please specify):
E. Do you have any feedback from students and their parents? Are they
satisfied with the service provided? (optional)
/