School-based After-school Learning and Support Programmes 2018/19 s.y.
School-based Grant - Programme Report
Name of School: Pentecostal Lam Hong Kwong Schoo l
Staff-in-charge: Mr.Ho Shu Chee Contact Telephone No.: 2648 8291
A. The number of students (count by heads) benefitted under the Grant is 12 (including A. 1 CSSA recipients, B.5 SFAS full-grant recipients
and C. 6 under school’s discretionary quota).
B. Information on Activities to be subsidised/complemented by the Grant.
Actual no. of
 
participating
 
eligible
 
students
#
*Name / Type of activity
A
B
C
Average
 
attendance
 
rate
Period/Date
 
activity held
Actual expenses
 
($)
Name of partner/
 
service provider
 
(if applicable)
Remarks if any
 
(e.g. students’ learning
 
and affective outcome)
1. S2 N4 summer programs
1
1
0
95%
15/7/2019-
26/7/2019
1400
Teen 行者少年事工
2. Gifted programs
0
0
2
95%
2019 summer time
5276
CUHK, HKUST
3. Cross-boundary learning
tour to Myanmar
0
1
2
100%
22/4/2019-
26/4/2019
6000
Jose Travel
4. English Study Tour to
Australia
0
3
2
100%
16/4/2019-
28/4/2019
17500
International Student
Exchange Centre
Total no. of activities: 4
@No. of man-times
1
5
6
**Total no. of man-times
12
Total Expenses
30176
Note:
* Types of activities are categorized as follows: tutorial service, learning skill training, languages training, visits, art /culture activities, sports, self-confidence development, volunteer service,
 
adventure activities, leadership training, and communication skills training courses.
@ Man-times: refers to the aggregate no. of benefitted students participating in each activity listed above.
** Total no. of man-times: the aggregate of man-times (A) + (B) + (C)
# Eligible students: students in receipt of CSSA (A), SFAS full grant (B) and disadvantaged students identified by the school under the discretionary quota (not more than 25%) (C).
 
C. Project Effectiveness
In general, how would you rate the achievements of the activities conducted to the benefitted
eligible students?
Improved
Please put a “” against the most appropriate box.
Significant
Moderate
Slight
No
Change
Declining
Not
Applicable
Learning Effectiveness
a) Students’ motivation for learning
b) Students’ study skills
c) Students’ academic achievement
d) Students’ learning experience outside classroom
e) Your overall view on students’ learning effectiveness
Personal and Social Development
f) Students’ self-esteem
g) Students’ self-management skills
h) Students’ social skills
i) Students’ interpersonal skills
j) Students’ cooperativeness with others
k) Students’ attitudes toward schooling
l) Students’ outlook on life
m) Your overall view on students’ personal and social
development
Community Involvement
n)
Students’ participation in extracurricular and voluntary
activities
o) Students’ sense of belonging
p) Students’ understanding on the community
q) Your overall view on students’ community involvement
 
D. Comments on the project conducted
Problems/difficulties encountered when implementing the project (You may tick more
than one box)
unable to identify the eligible students (i.e., students receiving CSSA, SFAS full grant);
difficult to select suitable non-eligible students to fill the discretionary quota;
eligible students unwilling to join the programmes (Please specify: ______________________);
the quality of service provided by partner/service provider not satisfactory;
tutors inexperienced and student management skills unsatisfactory;
the amount of administrative work leads to apparent increase on teachers’ workload;
complicated to fulfill the requirements for handling funds disbursed by EDB;
the reporting requirements too complicated and time-consuming;
Others (Please specify):
E. Do you have any feedback from students and their parents? Are they satisfied with
the service provided? (optional)
NIL